![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Rethinking Competition Policy in China’s Digital Markets: The Shift From Fair Play to Fair Deal
WANG Xuan
Full-Text PDF
XML 32 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2025.07.005
University of International Business and Economics (UIBE), Beijing, China
In today’s digital economy, the rapid development of platform economies is posing new challenges to traditional regulatory models. Foreign platform regulations, represented by those of the European Union, in fact protect three types of legal interests: the public interest, the legitimate rights and interests of competitors, and the legal interests of trading partners. They also balance two different types of legal relationships: competitive relationship and transactional relationship. This provides useful lessons for the healthy and orderly development of platform economies. China’s current Anti-Monopoly Law and Anti-Unfair Competition Law mainly focus on protecting competitive relationships. Although the E-Commerce Law does cover transactional relationships to some extent, it is limited by the context of its time and cannot keep up with the rapid development of new types of online services in the mobile internet era. To better protect the legitimate rights and interests of parties in platform economy transactions and to promote the sustainable and healthy development of platform economies, it is necessary to further highlight the principle of protecting fair trading in the general provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Based on transactional relationships, all platform online transactions and services should be included in a comprehensive regulatory system. A more scientific and rational legal framework for platform regulation should be built to promote high-quality development of China’s platform economy on the track of the rule of law.
transactional relationships, platform regulation, E-Commerce Law, Anti-Monopoly Law, Anti-Unfair Competition Law
WANG Xuan.Rethinking Competition Policy in China’s Digital Markets: The Shift From Fair Play to Fair Deal.US-China Law Review, July 2025, Vol. 22, No. 7, 362-373
Huang, Y. (2023). A study on legal measures to promote the development of the platform economy. Economic Herald, 32(10), 36-43.
Huang, Y. (2024). Reflections on China’s competition policy and enforcement in the era of artificial intelligence. Research on China Market Regulation, 33(8), 84-89.
Huang, Y. (2025). Liber Amicorum—Leading and riding the tide of China’s Competition Law. Paris: Concurrences.
Jin, S. M. (2013). Research on the legal interests of Anti-Monopoly Law: Paradigm and path. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Kong, X. J. (2025). Interpretation and application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.
Ning, L. Z. (2023). Commentary and interpretation of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Law Press China.
Qian, Y. Y. (2022). Five key relationships in China’s economic reform. In J. L. Wu (Ed.), Comparative Studies Vol. 2022-1 (p. 2). Beijing: CITIC Press Group.
Wang, X. Y. (2021). Some thoughts on antitrust regulation in the digital economy. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 39(4), 49-62.
Wu, Z. G. (2025). Interpretation of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Law Press China.
Xu, S. Y. (2015). The functional challenges in the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law and the coordination between competition policy and industrial policy. Competition Policy Research, 1(1), 79-90.
Zheng, W. T. (2023). The Chinese antitrust paradox. The University of Chicago Business Law Review, 2(2), Article 3.




