 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Problem of Logical Self-Circulation in Modern Scientific Theories and Its Resolution
CUI Weicheng, LI Rong, PAN Lingli, ZENG Lili
Full-Text PDF
XML 95 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5313/2025.06.001
Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Micro/Nano-Photonic/Electronic System Integration, Hangzhou, China
Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
This paper adopts a meta-scientific method to point out that the three major obstacles hindering the formation of a unified system theory in modern science are inconsistent concepts, conflicting basic assumptions, and differences in the selection of mathematical languages. It focuses on the issue of “selection of basic assumptions/axioms” for in-depth research. The paper analyzes the widespread problem of logical self-circulation in core theories across multiple fields of modern science, arguing that this problem is also an important reason for theoretical stagnation and the inability to explain phenomena in depth, and may lead to consequences in practical applications. In response, the paper reflects on the limitations of revolutionary methods and proposes a generalization method as a solution. The core of this method is to inherit the reasonable parts of Newtonian mechanics, reconstruct the physical theory of complex systems based on the latest cognition, adhere to clear concepts, logical self-consistency, and unrefuted axioms, and select axioms based on the criterion of supporting the sustainable development of human society. Finally, it points out that future research can be conducted in three directions: interdisciplinary research, new perspectives in the philosophy of science, and optimization of the logical structure of theories, so as to promote the improvement and development of scientific theories.
logical self-circulation, metascience, generalization method, scientific theory, basic assumption, sustainable development
CUI Weicheng, LI Rong, PAN Lingli, & ZENG Lili. (2025). The Problem of Logical Self-Circulation in Modern Scientific Theories and Its Resolution. Philosophy Study, Nov.-Dec. 2025, Vol. 15, No. 6, 291-314.
American Chemical Society (ACS). (1999). An international historic chemical landmark. Discovery and development of penicillin. Retrieved from http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/flemingpenicillin.html (accessed on Oct. 20, 2025)
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Baily, M. N., Brynjolfsson, E., & Korinek, A. (2023). Machines of mind: The case for an AI-powered productivity boom. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/machines-of-mind-the-case-for-an-ai-powered-productivity-boom/ (accessed on Oct. 20, 2025)
Bergman, J. (1993). A brief history of the theory of spontaneous generation. CEN Tech. J., 7(1), 73-81.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller (USA).
Bianconi, G., Arenas, A., Biamonte, J., Carr, L. D., Kahng, B., Kertesz, J., … Yasseri, T. (2023). Complex systems in the spotlight: Next steps after the 2021 Nobel Prize in physics. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 4, 010201. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ac7f75
Bishop, M. A., & Trout, J. D. (2002). 50 years of successful predictive modeling should be enough: Lessons for philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S197-S208.
Bodnia, E., Isenbaev, V., Colburn, K., Swearngin, J., & Bouwmeester, D. (2024). The quest for CMB signatures of conformal cyclic cosmology. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024, 009. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/009
Bohr, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 48, 696-702. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
Burago, S. G. (2017). About the theory of the Big Bang. The General Science Journal: Astrophysics, 1-7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26288.35840
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Castellani, B., & Gerrits, L. (2021). Map of the complexity sciences. Retrieved from https://art-sciencefactory.com/complexity-map_feb09.html (accessed on Oct. 20, 2025)
Chen, M. C., Wang, C., Liu, F. M., Wang, J.-W., Ying, C., Shang, Z.-X., … Pan, J.-W. (2022). Ruling out real-valued standard formalism of quantum theory. Physical Review Letters, 128(4), 040403. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.040403
Cheng, S., & Cui, W. (2024). The origin of science. Beijing: Citic Publishing Group. (in Chinese)
Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 474-496.
Cui, W. C. (2019a). On a logically consistent cosmological model based on Buddhist philosophy. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies, 3(1). 555605. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19080/ASM.2019.03.555605
Cui, W. C. (2019b). A comparison of BCM with BBCM. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies, 3(3), 555612. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19080/ASM.2019.03.555612
Cui, W. C., & Pan, L. L. (2022). Can one really disprove a real quantum theory? International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 12(1), 1-6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijtmp.20221201.01
Cui, W., Li, R., & Pan, L. L. (2023). A comparison of new general system theory philosophy with Einstein and Bohr. Philosophy Study, 13(1), 1-22. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2023.01.001
Cui, W. C., Li, R., & Pan, L. L. (2024). Toward a unified theory for complex systems. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(5), 69-103. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.125.17556
Daisaku, I., & Toynbee, A. (1999). Prospects for the 21st Century: Dialogues between Daisaku, I. and Toynbee, A. (C. S. Xun, J. Z. Zhu, & G. L. Chen, Trans.). Beijing: International Culture Press. (in Chinese)
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.
Douglas, H. (2016). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 701-714.
Earman, J. (1995). Bang! Crunch! Whimper! Or snap? On the fate of the cosmos. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 518-520.
Einstein, A. (1916). Relativity: The special and general theory. Meneola, NY: Dover Publications.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
Faizal, M., Krauss, L. M., Shabir, A., & Marino, F. (2025). Consequences of undecidability in physics on the theory of everything. Journal of Holography Applications in Physics, 5(2), 10-21. doi:10.22128/jhap.2025.1024.1118
Fitzpatrick, R. (2015). Quantum mechanics. Hackensack: World Scientific.
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojevic, S., … Uzzi, B. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359, 6379. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
Friedman, M. (1999). Reconsidering logical positivism. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 501-528.
Gödel, K. (1931). About formally undecidable sentences of the principia mathematica and related systems I. Monthly Magazines for Mathematics and Physics, 38, 173-198.
Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism, teachings, history and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City: Cambridge University Press.
Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time: From the Big Bang to black holes. New York: Bantam Press.
Hertog, T. (2023). On the origin of time: Stephen Hawking’s final theory. New York: Bantam Press.
Hilbert, D. (1902). Mathematical problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 8(10), 437-479. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1902-00923-3
Howson, C. (2000). Hume’s problem: Induction and the justification of belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), e124. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Jammer, M. (2000). Concepts of mass in contemporary physics and philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Johansson, L.-G. (2016). Philosophy of science for scientists. NY: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Kooi, B. (2024). Going around in circles. Argumentation, 38, 477-497. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-024-09640-1
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (2nd edition 1970; 3rd edition 1996; 4th edition 2012)
Kuorikoski, J. (2021). Modeling without models? Journal of Philosophy of Science, 88(4), 681-700.
Lange, M. (2005). Circularity, mathematical axioms, and the justification of induction. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 72(2), 209-235.
Lee, S. (2018). The science of the spiritual world. Taipei: Sancai Culture Co., Ltd. (in Chinese)
Li, Z. D., Mao, Y. L., Weilenmann, M., Tavakoli, A., Chen, H., Feng, L. X., … Fan, J. Y. (2022). Testing real quantum theory in an optical quantum network. Physical Review Letters, 128(4), 040402. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.040402
Ma, Y., & Cui, W. (2021). A comprehensive overview on various mind-body models. Philosophy Study, 11(11), 810-819. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2021.11.002
Mathew, K. J., Deepa, P. S., Karthick, S., & Sakshi, R. (2016). Evolution of altruism in humans. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 5(12), 45-65.
Maudlin, T. (2019). What is a wavefunction? Journal of Philosophy of Science, 86(2), 310-332.
Morrison, M. (2000). Unifying scientific theories: Physical concepts and mathematical structures. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 102-121.
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16(1-4), 95-100.
Newton, I. (1846). Newton’s principia: The mathematical principles of natural philosophy. (A. Motte, Trans.). New York: Daniel Adee. Originally published in 1687.
Pan, L. L., & Cui, W. C. (2022). Re-examination of fundamental concepts of heat, work, energy, entropy and information based on NGST. Philosophy Study, 12(1), 1-17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2022.01.001
Parrish, J. K., & Edelstein-Keshet, L. (1999). Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. Science, 284(5411), 99-101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411
Pasteur, L. (1862). Mémoire sur les corpuscules organisés qui existent dans l’atmosphère: Examen de la doctrine des générations spontanées. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier.
Planetary Boundaries Science. (2025). Planetary health check 2025. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany. Retrieved from https://planetaryhealthcheck.org (accessed on Oct. 20, 2025)
Penrose, R. (2012). Cycles of time: An extraordinary new view of the universe. London: Vintage.
Redi, F., Bigelow, M., & Bigelow, R. P. (1909). Experiments on the generation of insects. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Rees, M. J. (2009). Cosmology: Evidence for a “big bang”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ryckman, T. (2005). Einstein, Hilbert, and the origins of general relativity: A response to Renn and Sauer. Journal of Philosophy of Science, 72(4), 676-690.
Schooler, J. W. (2014). Metascience could rescue the “replication crisis”. Nature, 515, 9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/515009a
Sklar, L. (1981). Do unborn hypotheses have rights? Journal of Philosophy of Science, 48(2), 197-218.
Sober, E. (1993). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stegmüller, W. (1992). Main Currents in Contemporary Philosophy (Vols. 1 & 2). (B. W. Wang et al., Trans). Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)
Uzan, J.-P. (2015). The big-bang theory: Construction, evolution and status. In B. Duplantier and V. Rivasseau (Eds.), The universe: Poincaré seminar 2015 (pp. 1-72). Switzerland: Birkhäuser Cham.
Warren, D. L., Cardillo, M., Rosauer, D. F., & Bolnick, D. I. (2014). Mistaking geography for biology: Inferring processes from species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(10), 572-580. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.003
Whitaker, A. (2006). Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma—From quantum theory to quantum information (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wickramasinghe, C. (2022). Panspermia versus abiogenesis: A clash of cultures. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 36(1), 121-129. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31275/20222199