![]()  | 
                [email protected] | 
![]()  | 
                3275638434 | 
![]()  | 
                ![]()  | 
            
| Paper Publishing WeChat | 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Unveiling the Symbolism: A Comparative Exploration of Chinese Mandarin Square and British Heraldry
ZHU Wen-ting, ZHANG Hui-qin
Full-Text PDF
 
XML     22 Views 
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2025.10.008
Beijing City University, Beijing, China Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology, Beijing, China
The exchange and mutual appreciation of different cultures is an important topic in the context of globalization, and traditional patterns are the crystallization of the national cultures of various countries. The study focuses on the Ming Dynasty Mandarin square in ancient China and the Tudor Dynasty coat of arms during the same period in England. By using comparative research, case studies, and combining historical documents and images, the origins of the two types of decorations are traced, and their social connotations and influencing factors are analyzed. Research has shown that under the influence of the historical backgrounds of politics, economy, and culture, the two types of decorative patterns exhibit a realistic aesthetic trend. The cultural connotations not only demonstrate social narrative functions such as customs and rituals, but also reflect political system functions such as hierarchy and honor. The different historical origins give rise to cultural differences in the selection of decorative elements between the two. The comparative study of the two is not only beneficial for conducting decorative design research from a global perspective, but also can promote the modern inheritance of traditional patterns while seeking common ground and reserving differences.
Ming Dynasty, Tudor Dynasty, Mandarin square, coat of arms, connotations, comparative research
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, October 2025, Vol. 15, No. 10, 790-798
Boutell, Charles. (2008). English Heraldry. BiblioLife.
Dai, L. Q. (1995). A new exploration of the Ming ‘Buzi’. Liaohai Cultural Relics Journal, (2), 69-77.
Guy, J. (1997). The Tudor Monarchy. London & New York: Arnold.
Han, C. Y., & Zhu, Y. M. (2017). The cultural history of Chinese iconography of the Ming Dynasty Volume 1. Beijing: China Photographic House.
Jiang, Y. Q., & Zhao, F. (2021). The art of Chinese silks in the Ming Dynasty. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.
Liu, R. P., & Liu, C. (2020). On the Mongolian custom and Han System of the Ming Dynasty Official Uniform from “Xiongbei” to “Buzi.” Art & Design Research, (04), 59-62.
Painter, S. (1943). Studies in the history of English Feudal Barony. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.
Slater, S. (2004). The illustrated book of Heraldry: An international history of Heraldry and its contemporary uses. London: Anness Publishing Ltd.
Wang, Y. (2016). The Hierarchical system in clothing patterns: The style and system of Mandarin Square Clothing in the Ming and Qing Dynasties of China. Beijing: China Textile & Apparel Press.
Zhang, T. Y. (ed.). (1888). Ming Shi. Shanghai: Shanghai Tu Shu Ji Cheng Yin Shu Ju.
Zhao, F. (2005). The general history of Chinese silk. Suzhou: Soochow University Press.
Zhao, L. S. (2012). The role and influence of reward costume in the Ming Dynasty. Journal of Image History, (1), 135-146.
Zhao, X. X. (2023). Ming Jing Hua Zhang: The inheritance and innovation of the Ming Dynasty dermatoglyphic pattern in contemporary clothing. Beijing: China Textile & Apparel Press.



