 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Dynamic Uncertainty: Exploring the Spatial Order of Future Digital Architecture
Yuxin Zhao
Full-Text PDF
XML 406 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2024.10.002
ImaginationLancaster, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom
The spatial order of architecture has been significantly impacted by digital architectural design and production, creating a dynamic uncertainty. This study aims to explore digital architecture from the perspective of spatial order, discussing the antidote/poison effect caused by digital technologies in architectural practice and the cultural digital changes in digital architectures. The study selected four digital architecture cases, including the (W)rapper at Los Angeles by Eric Owen Moss, Beijing Daxing International Airport by Zaha Hadid, 3D Print Niaokan Bridge by Xu Weiguo, and World Internet Conference Center by Yuan Feng. This study is hypothesising that the future special order of digital architectures will be a dynamic and balanced new spatial order. This new order includes the symbiosis of a human-machine and virtual-real hierarchy; the interactive co-existence between nature, humanity and technology; and the creative multi-immersive sharing of parametric information, built-environment resources and cultural artistic information. The evolution of spatial order of future digital architecture will be discussed in connection with the idea of the metaverse. The value of this work is its ability to inspire a broader examination of the new order of digital architectural space.
Spatial superimposition, digital technology’s antidote & poison effect, the spatial order of digital architectures, alteration of spatial order.
Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 18 (2024) 475-484 doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2024.10.002
[1] Pitchnikova, G. A., and Antyfeev, A. V. 2019. “The Four Factors Influencing Media Architecture.” IOP International Conference on Construction Architecture and Technosphere Safety 687: 055026.
[2] Gu, X. W. 2018. “Technology Is the Antidote and Poison: Interviewing Bernard Stiegler.” China Writer Web. Accessed December 31, 2022. http://www.chinawriter.co m.cn/n1/2018/0427/c405057-29953400.html.
[3] Kong, L. M., and Yao, Q. F. 2020. “Construction of Architectural Space Order under the Evolution of the Grid System.” South Architecture 5: 84-9.
[4] Zhou, J., and Yu, J. 2017. “The Collision of Digital Technology and Architectural Space: The Development of Digital Architectural Art Applications.” Art Tasting14: 175-6.
[5] China Academy of Information and Communication Research. 2022. “White Paper on Digital Building Development.” CAICT. Accessed December 21, 2022. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202203/P020220330512284345397.pdf.
[6] Liu, G. 2017. “Digital Transformation Produce the Evolution of Industry.” China Engineering Consulting 12: 58-61.
[7] Peng, Y. G. 2008. Theory of Architectural Space Combination. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press.
[8] Lefebvre, H. (trans.). 2021. The Production of Space. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[9] Meng, B., Deng, W., and Peng, L. 2019. “Understanding of Space and Optimization of China Territory Space Functional Based on Geography.” Ecological Economy 35. (9): 170-6.
[10] Li, H., and Reynolds, J. F. 1995. “On Definition and Quantification of Heterogeneity.” Oikos 73 (2): 280-4.
[11] Zhang, X. F. 2018. “Discussion on the Formation of Architectural Form Based on the ‘Theory of Beauty in Relations’: Taking Museum Buildings as an Example.” Nan Chang University Academic 12: 1-79.
[12] Hu, J. 2017. “The Alternative Description of Spatial Order: The Evolution and Innovation of ‘Conception Space’.” Hua Zhong Architecture 35 (8): 12-6.
[13] Huang, W. X., and Wang, L. Y. 2022. “Digital Architecture Design and Research: A Broad Spatial Cognition.” World Architecture 11:64-67.
[14] Li, B., Zhang, J. S., Ludger, H., and Guo, Z. F. 2019. “Analyzing the Black Box of Design with Algorithm Model.” The Architect 41 (1): 94-9.
[15] Xu, W. G. 2020. “A Vision for Digital Architecture.” Contemporary Architecture 1 (2): 20-2.
[16] Xu, W. G. 2022. “From Digital Building Design to Intelligent Construction Practices.” Architecture Technology 53 (10): 1418-20.
[17] Yuan, F., Zhou, J. J., and Yan, C. 2019. “Cyborg Craftsmanship: A Human-Machine Collaboration Future in Architecture.” Architectural Journal 66 (4): 1-8.
[18] Yuan, F., Xu, X. H., and Li, K. K. 2022. “Rethinking the Architectural Digital Future in the Age of Anthropocene.” Architectural Journal 69 (9): 12-8.
[19] Seth, H., Talwar, S., Bhatia, A., Saxena, A., and Dhir, A. 2020. “Consumer Resistance and Inertia of Retail Investors: Development of the Resistance Adoption Inertia Continuance (RAIC) Framework.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 55 (July): 1-14.
[20] Ansong, E., and Boateng, R. 2019. “Surviving in the Digital Era-Business Models of Digital Enterprises in a Developing Economy.” Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 21 (2): 164-78.
[21] Kaplan, A., and Haenlein, M. 2019. “Digital Transformation and Disruption: On Big Data, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, and Other Things.” Business Horizons 62 (6): 679-832.
[22] Vial, G. 2019. “Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28 (2): 118-44.
[23] Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., and Haenlein, M. 2021. “Digital Transformation: A Multidisciplinary Reflection and Research Agenda.” Journal of Business Research 122 (Jan): 889-901.
[24] Wei, L. K. 2020. “Engineering Brain: Metaverse for Future Engineering AI in Civil Engineering.” Architectural Journal 67 (1): 2-18.
[25] Zhang, R. S. 2022. “Exploring the Theoretical Origins of Digital Architecture from the Perspective of Emotional Attachment: Cases of Three Pioneering Digital Architecture Theorist.” New Architecture 3 (5): 106-11.
[26] Liu, J., Liu, X. C., and Xu, W. G. 2022. “Sensing, Knowing, Connecting: Architecture in the Area of Intelligent Robots.” Contemporary Architecture 3 (6): 14-8.
[27] Yan, C., and Yuan, F. 2020. “A Post-humanist Tectonics: Technological and Cultural Reflections in Digital Fabrication.” Times Architecture 37 (3): 6-11.
[28] Xie, R. G. 2019. “Eric Owen Moss: As an Architect, I Provide Design, I Have Something to Give and Give Users A New Perspective to Perceive the World.” Zhihu Zhuanlan. Accessed December 30, 2022. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/69432668.
[29] Zhu, Y. L. 2021. “The Non-objective New Order: Analysis on the Evolution of Suprematism from Art to Architecture from the Perspective of Architectural Aesthetics.” Urbanism and Architecture 18 (10): 136-40.
[30] Tsinghua News. 2022. “The Fantastic Project of the 3D Print Bridge.” Tsinghua News. Accessed December 31, 2022. https://www.rd.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1054/1492.htm.
[31] Xu, W. G. 2020. “Digital Architecture: From Imagination to Reality.” Housing and Real Estate 26 (14): 10-7.
[32] Xu, W. G. 2012. “Balance between Theory and Practice, Conflict between Character and Convention: Dialogue between Eric Owen Moss and Xu Wei Guo.” Urban Environment Design 9 (10): 112-3.
[33] Tongji News. 2022. “The Award of World Internet Conference Center in Wuzhen.” Tongji News. Accessed December 31, 2022. https://news.tongji.edu.cn/info/1003/82476.htm.
[34] CMGJ. 2019. “The Design of World Internet Conference Center in Wuzhen.” CMGJ. Accessed December 31, 2022. https://www.archiposition.com/items/4fd298bad6.
[35] Yuan, F., Zhang, L. M., and Ma, H. S. 2020. “Generation, Simulation, Optimization and Construction Practicing Human-Machine Collaborative Tectonics in Wuzhen Internet Expo Center.” Architectural Journal 67 (8): 5-11.
[36] Cheng, S. Q. 2022. “The Production of Space and Justice of Space in Metaverse: Taking the ‘Virtual City’ as an Example.” Hebei Academic Journal 42 (5): 16-9.
[37] Shi, M. L., Peng, J. G., and Tang, F. H. 2010. “The Aesthetic Value of Order and the Aesthetic Pursuit of Contemporary Architecture.” Journal of Architecture 57 (4): 16-9.