 |
customer@davidpublishing.com |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Effects of Furniture Ergonomics on Student’s Satisfaction in a Library Facility
Dodo Mansir
Full-Text PDF
XML 1647 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7359/2024.08.003
Department of Building, Faculty of Environmental Design, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria 810107, Nigeria
Building occupants are not immune to ill-health as a result of time they spend in a building. This paper seeks to examine the effects furniture ergonomics have on student’s satisfaction in the library of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. A pilot survey was initially conducted in the library through a one-to-one interaction with students to fetch their opinions on the general effects of the furniture. An observation through several walkthroughs was also conducted by the researchers to compare and validate responses obtained. Two hundred and sixty-five students that come from fifteen nationalities are surveyed. A structured questionnaire is used to collect data on the respondents’ opinions on the size, shape, arrangement and comfort of the furniture. Eta cross tabulation, Spearman’s rho and Kendall’s Tau-b are used to establish relationships. Results show that amongst the effects studied, there are significant positive relationships between students’ satisfaction of furniture ergonomics as against back-strain and lack of concentration. This implies that the more the furniture arrangements, size and shape are perceived unsatisfactory, the more their effects on back-strain and lack of concentration towards the students. This paper further recommends that library management should see to designing IEQ (Indoor Environmental Quality) guidelines that will mitigate the effects of furniture ergonomics thus improving student’s satisfaction.
Ergonomics, furniture, library, satisfaction, students.
Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 18 (2024) 384-393 doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2024.08.003
[1] Andrew, S., and Michael, P. 2009. “Sustainable Workplaces: Improving Staff Health and Well-Being Using Plants.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 11 (1): 52-63.
[2] Ertugrul, T., Ergin, S. V. L., and Metin, A. 2004. “A Qualitative Study of Facilities and Their Environmental Performance.” Management of Environmental Quality 15 (2): 154-73.
[3] Edwin, H. W., and Chan, E. A. 2008. “Evaluation on Indoor Environment Quality of Dense Urban Residential Buildings.” Journal of Facilities Management 6 (4): 245-65.
[4] Barry, P. H. 2008. “The Impact of Office Comfort on Productivity.” Journal of Facilities Management 6 (1): 37-51.
[5] Clements-Croome, D. J., Awbia, H. B., Zs Bako, B., Kochhara, N., and Williams, M. 2008. “Ventilation Rates in Schools.” Building and Environment 43: 362-7.
[6] Morris, A., and Dennison, P. 1995. “Sick Building Syndrome: Survey Findings of Libraries in Great Britain.” Library Management 16 (3): 34-42.
[7] David, L. 1998. “Evaluating User Satisfaction: Case Studies in Australia.” Facilities 16 (5/6): 138-42.
[8] James, R. 1994. “Ergonomics in Academic Libraries.” Library Management 15 (1): 26-35.
[9] Reginald, C. 2002. “In Quest of an Ideal Library Environment: The Case of the Main Library, the University of West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.” Library Review 51 (6): 287-92.
[10] Mark, J. M., Terry, B., Lee, H., David, J. O, Francis, J. O., Bradley, H.T., Kenneth, M. W., Richard, C. D., and William, J. F. 2006. “Causes and Prevention of Symptom Complaints in Office Buildings: Distilling the Experience of Indoor Environmental Quality investigators.” Facilities 24 (11/12): 436-44
[11] Audrey, K., and Stan, A. 1996. “Productivity Paradox: Work Settings for Knowledge Work.” Facilities 14 (3/4): 6-14.
[12] Cynthia, U., and Megan, T. M. 2008. “The Walls Speaks: The Interplay of Quality Facilities, School Climate and Student Achievement.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (1): 55-73.
[13] Adrian, L., and Bill, B. 1998. Design for Manageability in Sick Building Syndrome: Concepts, Issues and Practice. London: E. and FN Spon, pp. 135-50.
[14] Thad, G. 1995. Sick Buildings; Definition, Diagnosis and Mitigation. Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc.
[15] Nyuk, H. W., and Wy, L. S. J. 2003. “Total Building Performance Evaluation of Academic Institutions in Singapore.” Building and Environment 38: 161-76.
[16] Zinbarg, R., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., and McDonald, R. 2006. “Estimating Generalizability to a Universe of Indicators That All Have an Attribute in Common: A Comparison of Estimators.” Applied Psychological Measurement 30: 121-44.