![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Positive Significance of Confucian Civilization in Peace Building
PU Jingxin, ZHENG Hongju
Full-Text PDF
XML 465 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2024.01.002
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China
The Confucian emphasis on benevolence and empathy can be applied in conflict resolution processes. When parties in conflict embrace these values, it becomes easier to find common ground, compromise, and work towards peaceful solutions. Confucian civilization, with its emphasis on ethics, harmony, and diplomacy, offers valuable contributions to peace-building efforts in the contemporary world. By promoting virtuous leadership, fostering cross-cultural understanding, and emphasizing ethical governance, Confucianism can play a positive role in achieving and maintaining global peace. Confucianism continues to exert significant influence in the contemporary world, particularly in the context of peace-building efforts. This article explores the positive significance of Confucian civilization in contributing to peace-building endeavors globally.
Confucian civilization, Confucianism, benevolence, peace-building, harmony, cross-cultural understanding
PU Jingxin & ZHENG Hongju. (2024). The Positive Significance of Confucian Civilization in Peace Building. International Relations and Diplomacy, Jan.-Feb. 2024, Vol. 12, No. 1, 18-25.
Ames, R. T., & Rosemont, H. Jr. (1998). The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Ames, R. T., & Rosemont, H., Jr. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bell, D. A. (2006). China’s new Confucianism: Politics and everyday life in a changing society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bell, D. A. (2016). The China model: Political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chai, C. S., & Chai, C. S. (2006). Confucianism and human rights. Asia Research Institute Working Paper Series.
Chan, W. T. (1963). A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Confucius. (1979). The analects. (D. C. Lau, trans.). London: Penguin Classics.
De Bary, W. T. (2008). Confucian tradition and global education. Asia Policy, 5, 1-11.
Huang, Y. (1997). Reading the River Classic and living Dao in the twenty-first century. The Journal of Asian Studies, 56(1), 4-27.
Kim, C. K. (2013). Confucianism in contemporary society. In The Oxford handbook of world philosophy (pp. 240-255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nylan, M., & Slingerland, E. (2008). Confucius analects: With selections from traditional commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Shun, K.-L. (1997). Mencius and early Chinese thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tu, W. M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. New York: State University of New York Press.
Tu, W.-M. (1996). Confucian ethics today: The Singapore challenge. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yao, X. (2013). Reconsidering Confucian humanism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 8(3), 324-342.