Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

ABSTRACT

After several former studies on the cognitive heuristics and correlating economical influences, the explanatory effectiveness of Status Quo Bias perspective is explained by multiple empirical scenarios. Hence, this essay will focus on three applications in which the Status Quo Bias perspective, correlating models, and research methods would provide insightful opinions. After reviewing the former attempts on the original model and early researchers’ empirical examination on the Status Quo Bias, this essay will concentrate on Status Quo Bias and technology resistance among the public sector employees, Status Quo Bias and medical insurance outcomes, Status Quo Bias and shoppers’ mobile website purchasing resistance respectively. For each application, research methodology will be explained and be integrated into the Status Quo Bias perspective through the research question. Through researching on these applications’ methodology and main studies, discussing cognitive biases existing in the empirical scenarios, the present study could approach to the efficiency of the explanation from Status Quo Bias perspective.

KEYWORDS

literature review, Status Quo Bias, technology resistance, quantitative study, behavioral economics

Cite this paper

Psychology Research, January 2024, Vol. 14, No. 1, 36-43

References

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 35(1), 124-140.

Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Business research methods. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Harrison, G. W., List, J. A., & Towe, C. (2007). Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments. A case study of risk aversion. Econometrica, 75, 433-458.

Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. Am. Econ. Rev., 92, 1644-1655.

Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects, new data without order effects. Am. Econ. Rev., 95, 902-912

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.

Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Q, 33(3), 567-582.

Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59-87.

Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain, 1(1), 7-59.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus., 59, 251-278.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]