Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
The Individual Right to Property and Forced Expropriation—Analysis of Law and Economics
Author(s)
Odysseas Kopsidas
Full-Text PDF
XML 571 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2023.02.001
Affiliation(s)
European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
ABSTRACT
Vilfrendo Pareto describes the
excellent distribution of economic resources which simultaneously achieves
maximum productive efficiency and social justice. The Constitution of Greece
describes the process of compulsory expropriation of property when there is a
public need. The compensation criteria for this expropriation do not take into
account the positive and negative externalities that the subsequent public
project will cause. The consequence of this paper is the unjust social
distribution of economic resources. The aim of this paper is to investigate
this weakness of the compensation system that does not meet the criteria for
Pareto improvement, while a constitutional analysis of comparative law
concerning the provision of property is made. An appendix to the case law of
the Greek Court of Audit is provided. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is
proposed as the most complete for the experimental assessment of the maximum
amount of compensation of owners during the process of forced expropriation
through Experimental Economics tools.
KEYWORDS
property, expropriation, constitution, comparative law, compensation
Cite this paper
References