 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Research on Parent-Child Communication Mechanism in Family Education Based on Emotional Reasoning
SHI Guiju
Full-Text PDF
XML 318 Views
DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2023.01.004
Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
Emotional reasoning means the judgment subjectively based on the emotional experiences, which has two opposite aspects: On one hand, it can make human thoughts be worse, especially, given the difficulty of rational reasoning. On the other hand, it may result in the cognitive bias because of lacking of objective evidence. With the theme of “Parent-Child Communication Mechanism in Family Education Based on Emotional Reasoning Theory”, this study strives to explore the authenticity, mechanism construction, and related optimization mechanism strategies of parent-child communication from the perspective of emotional reasoning in the field of family education, in order to make parent-child communication in family education more harmonious and effective.
emotional reasoning, rational reasoning, family education, parent-child communication
SHI Guiju. (2023). Research on Parent-Child Communication Mechanism in Family Education Based on Emotional Reasoning. US-China Education Review A, Jan.-Feb. 2023, Vol. 13, No. 1, 31-35.
Arntz, A., Rauner, M., & van den Hout, M. (1995). “If I feel anxious, there must be danger”: Ex-consequentia reasoning in inferring danger in anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(8), 917-925.
Alkozei, A., Cooper, P. J., & Creswell, C. (2013). Emotional reasoning and anxiety sensitivity: Associations with social anxiety disorder in childhood. Journal of Affective Disorders, 152-154, 219-228.
Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the cricumplex model. Child Development, 56(2), 438-447.
Bailey, L. B. (2006). Interactive homework: A tool for fostering parent-child interactions and improving learning outcomes for at-risk young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(2), 155-167.