Contact us
[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
LIU Jingdong
WANG Lulu
Full-Text PDF XML 287 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2022.08.001
Affiliation(s)
Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing, China
Beijing Chance Bridge Law Firm, Beijing, China
ABSTRACT
Since 2015, the Supreme
People’s Court of China has published several important judicial documents,
requiring the correct interpretation and application of the New York Convention,
the unification of judicial standards, and the lawful and timely recognition
and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards relating to the Belt and Road
Initiative. By studying cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of
foreign arbitral awards ruled by Chinese courts between 2015 and 2017 and
referring to official replies made by the Supreme People’s Court to lower
courts’ requests for instructions before 2015, this article examines the
achievements and shortcomings in Chinese courts’ exercise of the judicial
review power under the New York Convention in the context of pursuing the Belt
and Road Initiative, thus providing an empirical foundation to develop and
improve China’s system of judicial review of foreign-related arbitration in the
future.
KEYWORDS
New York Convention, judicial review, foreign arbitral awards
Cite this paper
References