[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
A Study on Semantic Relations of “and” Used in Chinese EFL Learners’ Narrative Writing
LI Cai-hong
Full-Text PDF XML 252 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2022.11.012
School of Foreign Languages, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Studies on conjunctions used by Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners over the past ten years have focused mainly on the use of conjunctions in argumentative writing, and there is little empirical work on conjunction “and” in narrative writing. The purpose of this paper is to explore the characteristics of the semantic relations of “and” used in the narrative writing of Chinese EFL learners from the perspective of text coherence. Through analysis of narrative writing of 29 sophomores, this study investigates the characteristics of semantic relations expressed by the conjunction “and” and the differences in the use of semantic relations of “and” between high-score and low-score writing. The results show different frequencies of the use of semantic relations of “and”. ELF learners prefer to use the term “and” to build progressive relation and parallel relation more than any other relation. Both high-score and low-score writing use a sizable number of “and” to build progressive relation and parallel relation, but high-score writing obviously contains more guiding relations and fewer supplementary relations. These findings have some pedagogical implications for teaching transitions.
Cohesion Theory, conjunction “and”, ELF learners, semantic relation
Journal of Literature and Art Studies, November 2022, Vol. 12, No. 11, 1169-1174
Appel, R., & Szeib, A. (2018). Linking adverbials in L2 English academic writing: L1-related differences. System, 78, 115-129.
Golparvar, S. E., & Abolhasani, H. (2022). Unpacking the contribution of linguistic features to graph writing quality: An analytic scoring approach. Assessing Writing, 53, 100644.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Han, C., & Gardner, S. (2021). However and other transitions in the Han CH-EN corpus. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 100984.
Kim, M., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Modeling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing. Assessing Writing, 37, 39-56.
Qin, W., & Uccelli, P. (2016). Same language, different functions: A cross-genre analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 3-17.
潘璠, & 冯跃进. (2004). 非英语专业研究生写作中连接词用法的语料库调查. 现代外语, 27(2), 157-162.
王畅, & 杨玉晨. (2014). 英语写作语篇中并列结构连接词 and 用法探析. 东北师大学报: 哲学社会科学版, (2), 108-111.