Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Shanghai Starriver Bilingual School, Shanghai, China

ABSTRACT

The problem that consumers often fail to read the standard form contracts they willingly enter into has been recognized by many scholars. This is a pressing issue because it may result in the consumers being disadvantaged in bargains. Several laws have already been put in place to protect consumers, but the protection is often inadequate. This essay assesses how the current solutions are carried out and investigates whether new methods can be put in place. It argues that the key to dealing with the no-reading phenomenon is to make contracts more accessible to consumers so that they can be more inclined to guard their own interests.

KEYWORDS

no-reading problem, consumer protection, standard form contracts

Cite this paper

Psychology Research, August 2022, Vol. 12, No. 8, 640-642

References

Arvind, T. T. (Ed.). (2019). Chapter 2. Bargaining and agreeing: Offer, acceptance, and formation. In Contract law (pp. 19-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ayres, I., & Schwartz, A. (2014). The no-reading problem in consumer contract law. Stanford Law Review, 66(3), 545-610.

Bakos, Y. N., & Trossen, D. R. (2009). Does anyone read the fine print? Testing a law and economics approach to standard form contracts. Working Papers 09-04. NET Institute.

Busch, C. (2019). Implementing personalized law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 86(2), 309-332.

Parliament of the United Kingdom (2015). Consumer rights act 2015.

Hale, R. (2015). Recent developments in online consumer contracts. Business Lawyer, 71(1), 353-360.

Mello, J. P. (2012). Apple scraps controversial terms in iBook Author Eula Agreement. PCWorld. Retrieved from www.pcworld.com/article/474186/apple_scraps_controversial_terms_in_i book_author_eula_agreement.html (accessed on 5 Apr. 2022)

O’Sullivan, J. (2020). O’Sullivan & Hilliard’s The law of contract (core texts series) (9th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Porat, A., & Strahilevitz, L. J. (2013). Personalizing default rules and disclosure with big data. Mich. L. Rev., 112, 1417-1478.

Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ram, D. (2022). An analysis on the terms and conditions of the Clickwrap Agreement and the benefits of maintaining the Click Wrap Agreement in cloud computing. In Regulatory aspects of artificial intelligence on blockchain (pp. 205-224). Hershey: IGI Global.

Sheldon, J. E. (1974). Consumer protection and standard contracts: The Swedish experiment in administrative control. Am. J. Comp. L., 22, 17-70.

Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2017). The perverse consequences of disclosing standard terms. Cornell L. Rev., 103, 117-176.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]