![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Laura Arosio
Full-Text PDF
XML 564 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5526/2022.03.001
University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
partner choice, couples’ places of meeting, social class, homogamy, marriage, Italy
Sociology Study, May-June 2022, Vol. 12, No. 3, 77-87
Arosio, L. (2015). Parental divorce, cohabitation and the celebration of marriage in Italy. Revue Internationale de Sociologie/International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 166-179.
Arosio, L. (2016). Romantic love. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Arosio, L. (2017). Quanti sono gli italiani che trovano il loro partner su Internet? (How many Italians find their partners on the Internet?). Retrieved from http://www.neodemos.info/articoli/quanti-sono-gli-italiani-che-trovano-il-loro-partner-su-internet/
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.
Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network: Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. London: Tavistock.
Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (1987). La Decouverte du Conjoint I: Evolution et morphologie des scenes de rencontre. Population, 42(6), 943-966.
Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (1988). La Decouverte du Conjoint II: Les scenes de rencontre dans l’espace social. Population, 43(1), 121-150.
Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (1989). Finding a spouse: A survey of how French couples meet. Population, 44(1), 91-121.
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110(25), 10135-10140.
Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (Eds.). (2004). Occupational ghettos. The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Coleman, D. A. (1981). The effect of socio-economic class, regional origin and other variables on marital mobility in Britain 1920-1960. Annals of Human Biology, 8(1), 1-24.
Esping-Anderson, G. (2016). Families in the 21st century. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
Eurostat. (2019). Demography. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Istat. (2021). Noi Italia. 100 statistics to understand the country we live in. Retrieved from https://noi-italia.istat.it/
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395-421.
Kalmijn, M., & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces, 79(4), 1289-1312.
Karney, B. R. (2021). Socioeconomic status and intimate relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 391-414.
Lampard, R. (2007). Couples’ places of meeting in late 20th century Britain: Class, continuity and change. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 357-371.
Lampard, R. (2020). Meeting online or offline? Patterns and trends for co-resident couples in early 21st-century Britain. Sociological Research Online, 25(4), 589-608.
Mollenhorst, G., Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2008). Social contexts and personal relationships: The effect of meeting opportunities on similarity for relationships of different strength. Social Networks, 30(1), 60-68.
Potarca, G. (2017). Does the internet affect assortative mating? Evidence from the U.S. and Germany. Social Science Research, 61, 278-297.
Rosenfeld, M. J., Reuben, J. T., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 116(36), 17753-17758.