Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

ABSTRACT

This article focuses on the study of the places where spouses first met in contemporary Italy. Using data provided by the nationally representative survey “Family, Social Subjects and the Life Cycle”, carried out in 2016 by Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat) and made available in 2020, the article investigates trends in couples’ places of meeting and the relation between contexts of meeting and structural determinants such as social class and territorial affiliation. The results support the idea that even in contemporary societies partner’s choice is shaped by a set of social and cultural constraints and is not solely the result of personal preferences inspired by the ideal of romantic love.

KEYWORDS

partner choice, couples’ places of meeting, social class, homogamy, marriage, Italy

Cite this paper

Sociology Study, May-June 2022, Vol. 12, No. 3, 77-87

References

Arosio, L. (2015). Parental divorce, cohabitation and the celebration of marriage in Italy. Revue Internationale de Sociologie/International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 166-179.

Arosio, L. (2016). Romantic love. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Arosio, L. (2017). Quanti sono gli italiani che trovano il loro partner su Internet? (How many Italians find their partners on the Internet?). Retrieved from http://www.neodemos.info/articoli/quanti-sono-gli-italiani-che-trovano-il-loro-partner-su-internet/

Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network: Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. London: Tavistock.

Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (1987). La Decouverte du Conjoint I: Evolution et morphologie des scenes de rencontre. Population, 42(6), 943-966.

Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (1988). La Decouverte du Conjoint II: Les scenes de rencontre dans l’espace social. Population, 43(1), 121-150.

Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (1989). Finding a spouse: A survey of how French couples meet. Population, 44(1), 91-121.

Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110(25), 10135-10140.

Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (Eds.). (2004). Occupational ghettos. The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Coleman, D. A. (1981). The effect of socio-economic class, regional origin and other variables on marital mobility in Britain 1920-1960. Annals of Human Biology, 8(1), 1-24.

Esping-Anderson, G. (2016). Families in the 21st century. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

Eurostat. (2019). Demography. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Istat. (2021). Noi Italia. 100 statistics to understand the country we live in. Retrieved from https://noi-italia.istat.it/

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395-421.

Kalmijn, M., & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces, 79(4), 1289-1312.

Karney, B. R. (2021). Socioeconomic status and intimate relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 391-414.

Lampard, R. (2007). Couples’ places of meeting in late 20th century Britain: Class, continuity and change. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 357-371.

Lampard, R. (2020). Meeting online or offline? Patterns and trends for co-resident couples in early 21st-century Britain. Sociological Research Online, 25(4), 589-608.

Mollenhorst, G., Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2008). Social contexts and personal relationships: The effect of meeting opportunities on similarity for relationships of different strength. Social Networks, 30(1), 60-68.

Potarca, G. (2017). Does the internet affect assortative mating? Evidence from the U.S. and Germany. Social Science Research, 61, 278-297.

Rosenfeld, M. J., Reuben, J. T., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 116(36), 17753-17758.

Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]