Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

ABSTRACT

This research was carried out to determine which ideology teachers are closer to, by evaluating teachers’ opinions on curriculum in terms of the “scholar academic ideology, “social efficiency ideology”, “learner-centered ideology”, and “social reconstruction ideology”. It is a qualitative research. The sample of the research consists of 15 teachers working in primary, secondary, and high schools. The research data were obtained from nine open-ended questions supported by sub-questions added to each. It has been observed that the teachers define the purpose of education, the source of knowledge, the definition of learning, the purpose of teaching, the purpose of student assessment, the evaluation of the program, the understanding of formative and summative evaluation of curriculum according to the “social efficiency ideology” from Schiro’s ideological classification. Teachers have also defined the source of knowledge, the definition of learning, and the purpose of teaching and student assessment according to “scholar academic ideology”. In the results of the research, it was seen that the opinions of the teachers were influenced, albeit slightly, by the “learner-centered ideology” in evaluating students and determining the needs of the program. In light of these results, it is evident that teachers’ philosophical opinions need to be strengthened.

KEYWORDS

educational philosophy, curriculum theory, curriculum ideology, teachers’ curriculum ideology, teachers’ beliefs

Cite this paper

Fatma Mizikaci, Selma Sarioğlu, M. Bachirou Djibril Issoufou, & Deniz Enginyurt. (2021). An Analysis of Teachers’ Reflections on Schiro’s Classification of Curriculum Ideologies. Philosophy Study, November 2021, Vol. 11, No. 11, 859-875.

References

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1988). Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology. Brookings papers on Education Policy: 1988. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Barth, R. S. (1972). Open education and the American school. New York: Schocken Books and Agathon Press.

Bennett, W., Finn, C., & Crib, J. (1999). The educated child: A parent’s guide from preschool through eighth grade. New York: Free Press.

Berkan, G. H., & Özaslan, D. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim inançlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(Özel Sayı). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/697103

Bobbitt, F. (1913). Some general principles of management applied to problem of city school systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (11. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Cevizci, A. (2012). Bilgifelfesi. İstanbul: Say Yayınları.

Çoban, A. (2007). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin eğitim sürecine ilişkin felsefi tercihlerini değerlendirme. Üniversite ve Toplum, 7(4), 1-11. 

Counts, G. S. (1932). Dare the school build a new social order? New York: John Day.

Counts, G. S. (1934). The social foundations of education. New York: John Day.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2008). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Dewey, J., & Dewey, E. (1915). Schools of tomorrow. New York: E. P. Dutton.

Doğanay, A., & Sarı, M. (2003). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin sahip olduklari eğitim felsefelerine ilişkin algilarinin değerlendirilmesi “öğretmenlerin eğitim felsefeleri”. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/256443

Edwards, C. (2002). Three approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emillia. Retrieved 20.07.2020 form http://www.ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/edwards.htlm 

Fidan, N., & Erden, M. (1998). Eğitime giriş. İstanbul: Alkım Yayınları.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Giroux, H. A. (2005). Border crossing: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.

Giroux, H. A. (2006). America on the edge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Giroux, H. A. (2009). Dil/kültürel incelemler alanında eleştirel pedagojinin bir rolü var mıdır? Eleştirel pedagolji söyleşileri (E. Ç. Babaoğlu, Trans.). İstanbul: Kalkedaon Yayınları.

Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2003). High-stake testing and the default philosophy of education. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 51-58.

Gutek, G. L. (2014). Eğitime felsefi ve ideolojik yaklaşımlar (N. Kale, Trans.). Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları.

Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy. Boston: Hougton Miflin.

Hotaman, D. (2017). Eğitim programlarının geliştirilmesinde felsefenin rolü. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 29-42.

Ilgaz, G., Bülbül, T., & Çuhadar, C. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim inançları ile öz-yeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Abantİzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 50-65.

Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 120-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kasuga, W. (2020). Curriculum ideologies underpinning curriculum in Tanzania: A pre-service science teachers perspectives. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(3), 226-235. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3757359

King, A. R., & Brownell, J. A. (1966). The curriculum and the disciplines of knowledge. New York: Wiley.

Kridel, C. (2010). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. London, New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Kumral, O. (2015). Pedagojik formasyon eğitimi sertifika programina katilan öğretmen adaylarinin eğitim felsefeleri. Eğitimve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 73-80.

Lessinger, L., & Salowe, A. (2001). Healing public schools. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

Marulcu, I., & Akbıyık, C. (2014). Curriculum ideologies: Re-exploring prospective teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(5), 200-206.

Mclaren, P. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.

Mclaren, P., & Grioux, H. (1997). Writing from the margins: Geographies of identity, pedagogy, and power. In P. Mclaren (Ed.), Revolutionary multiculturalism: Pedagogies of dissent for the new millennium. Boulder, CO: Westopinion Press.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Oliver, C., & Lippman, P. C. (2007). Examining space and place in learning environment. Paper presented at the Connected International Conference on Design Education, July 9-12, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, P. E. (2009). Eğitim Programı Temeller, İlkeler ve Sorunlar (A. Arı, Trans. and Ed.). Konya: Eğitim Yayınları.

Phenix, P. H. (1964). The architectononics of knowledge. In S. Elam (Ed), Education and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Rousseau, J. J. (1979). Emile. New York: Basic Books.

Rugg, H. O., & Shumaker, A. (1928). The child centered-schools. New York: World Book.

Schiro, M. S. (2008). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Los Angeles, London: Sage Publication.

Schiro, M. S. (2020). Eğitim programı kuramları (F. Mızıkacı, Trans. and Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Schwab, J. J. (1964). Problems, topics, and issues. In S. Elam (Ed.), Education and the structure of knowledge and curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Silvernail, D. L. (1992). The educational philosophies of secondary school teachers. The High School Journal, 75(3), 162-167.

St. Pierre, E. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 239-266.

Tahirsylaj, A. (2018). Curriculum field in the making: Influences that led to social efficiency as dominant curriculum ideology in progressive era in the US. Euro-JCS, 4(1), 618-628.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Walberg, H. J., & Thomas, S. C. (1971). Characteristics of open education: Toward an operational definition. Newton, MA: Educational Development Center.

Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000). Opinion forming in phenomenology grounded theory: Is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 6(31), 1485-1492.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]