[email protected] | |
3275638434 | |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Learning Style Preferences and the Level of L2 Achievement: A Case Study of EFL College Students
I-Ju Chen
Full-Text PDF XML 679 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2020.11.012
Ling Tung University, Taiwan
This study investigated the relationship between learning styles preferences of English as foreign language (EFL) college students from three different achievement levels and to explore whether there is statistically significant difference between different achievement levels and different learning styles. A total of 120 EFL freshman college students from high, intermediate, and basic levels in Taiwan participated in the present study. Using a learning style preference checklist, students’ perceptional learning styles were first explored in terms of preferences. 120 participants with different levels were classified based on their English scores on College Entrance Exam. With the use of descriptive statistics and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the results indicated that specific learning style preference correlated with certain achievement levels of students. Students with different achievement levels preferred significantly certain style preference to other style comparing to other achievement levels. It seems that learning styles preferences may not definitely relate to a student’s achievement levels. Certain variables may also probably affect learning style preferences with respect to English performance.
learning style preferences, EFL, achievement levels, College Entrance Exam
Awang, H., Samad, N. A., Mohd Faiz, N. Z., Roddin, R., & Kankia, J. D. (2017). Relationship between learning styles preferences and academic achievement. International Research and Innovation Summit, 226, 1-5.
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E. (2000). Using learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college level. System, 28, 115-133.
Bicer, D. (2014). The effect of students’ and instructors’ learning styles on achievement of foreign language preparatory school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 382-386. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.067
Chen, Y. C. (1999). The perceptual learning style preferences of Taiwanese junior high school students in learning English (Unpublished master thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan).
Chen, C., Jones, K. T., & Xu, A. S. (2018). The association between students’ style of learning preferences, social presence, collaborative learning and learning outcomes. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1-16.
Cimermanova, I. (2018). The effect of learning styles on academic achievement in different forms of teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 219-232.
Cutolo, A., & Rochford, R. A. (2007). An analysis of freshmen learning styles and their relationship to academic achievement. College Quarterly, 10, 1-17.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1991). Productivity environmental preference survey. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems, Inc.
Fleming, N. D. (1995). I’m different; not dumb. Modes of presentation (VARK) in the tertiary classroom. In A. Zelmer (Ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australia (HERDSA) (pp. 308-313). Rockhampton, July 1995.
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-781.
Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1996). Index of learning styles. Retrieved from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyes/ilsweb.html
Gohar, M. J., & Sadeghi, N. (2015). The impact of learning style of preferences on foreign language achievement: A case study of Iranian EFL students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 754-764. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.188
Jayanama, B. (2017). Relationship between learning styles and academic achievement of low and high proficiency students in Foundation English of Srinakharinwirot University. Human Science, 9(2), 18-30.
Kim, T. Y., & Kim, Y. K. (2014). A structural model for perceptual learning styles, the ideal L2 self, motivated behavior, and English proficiency. System, 46, 14-27. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.007
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Naserieh, F., & Sarab, M. R. A. (2013). Perceptual learning style preferences among Iranian graduate students. System, 41, 122-133. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.018
O’Brien, L. (1990). Learning channel preference checklist (LCPC). Rockville, MD: Specific Diagnostic Services.
Power, C. M. (2016). Music student satisfaction: The relationship between learning style preferences and major satisfaction (Unpublished master thesis, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville).
Reid, J. M. (1984). Perceptual learning style preference questionnaire. Laramie: Department of English, University of Wyoming.
Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. The Journal of Psychology, 97, 213-223.
Rundle, S., & Dunn, R. (2000). Building excellence. Pittsford, NY: Performance Concepts International.
Soureshjani, K. H., & Naseri, N. (2012). Perceptual learning-style preferences of Iranian EFL learners in relation to their proficiency level. American Journal of Linguistics, 1(4), 70-74. doi:10.5923/j.linguistics.20120104.01
Yazici, K. (2017). The relationship between learning style, test anxiety and academic achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 61-71.
Yeow, T., Min, T., Loh, L., & Blitz, J. (2010). An investigation into the learning styles, English proficiency and assessment performance of medical students. International Journal of Science, Medicine and Education, 4(1), 7-13.