 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Intertextuality in The Sound and the Fury
LAI Ji-xiang
Full-Text PDF
XML 831 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2020.11.002
School of International Studies, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310000 China
This paper analysed The Sound and the Fury with the theory of intertextuality, with the aim of going back to intersubjectivity, as promoted by Mikhail Bakhtin. Drawing insight from Susan Sontag’s opinion on “interpretation”, the author highlights the importance of openness and indeterminacy, as well as the significance of the “form”. The author argues that Faulkner found his own voice in the dialogue with previous writers and invited readers to interact with the texts as well.
interpretation, intertextuality, William Faulkner, Julia Kristeva, Mikhail Bakhtin
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
Bauer, M. D. (2000). I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood: Quentin’s recognition of his guilt. The Southern Literary Journal, 32(2), 70-89. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20078268. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
Beja, M. (1980). Third things learned in Zurich: The seventh international James Joyce symposium, 11-16 June 1979. James Joyce Quarterly, 17, 204.
Blotner, J. (1974). Faulkner: A biography. New York: Random House.
Blotner, J. (1977). Selected letters of William Faulkner. New York: Random House.
Brooks, C. (1978). William Faulkner: Toward Yoknapatawpha and beyond. New Haven: Yale UP.
Broughton, P. R. (1981). Faulkner’s Cubist novels. A cosmos of my own: Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha (pp. 64-65). D. Fowler and A. J. Abadie (Eds.). Jackson: UP of Mississippi.
Faulkner, W. (2009). The Sound and the Fury. Vintage Classics.
Fluck, W. (2000). The search for distance: Negation and negativity in Wolfgang Iser’s literary theory. New Literary History, 31(1), 175-210. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20057593. Accessed 29 Feb. 2020.
Groden, M. (1975). Criticism in new composition: Ulysses and the sound and the fury. Twentieth Century Literature, 21(3), 265-277.
Hagopian, J. V. (1982). Nihilism in Faulkner’s the sound and the fury. In A. F. Kinney (Ed.), Critical essays on William Faulkner: The compson family. Boston: Hall.
Iser, W. (1977). Antrittsrede. Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften fur das Jahr 1976 (Heidelberg), 27.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Qiping, Y. (1994). On intertextuality. Foreign Literature Review, 2(44).
Rota, C. D. (1992). Rhetorical Irony and modern American fiction: The Clergy in the novels of William Faulkner, Flannery O’Connor, and John Updike (Dissertation Abstracts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois U.).
Sontag, S. (2001). Against interpretation: And other essays (Vol. 52). Macmillan.
Stoicheff, P. (1992). Between originality and indebtedness: allegories of authorship in William Faulkner’s “The Sound and the Fury.”. Modern Language Quarterly, 53(4), 449-464.