![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Elizabeth I: Gender and Paradigm
Rebecca Dean
Full-Text PDF
XML 600 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2018.12.012
Northampton Community College, Bethlehem, USA
Elizabeth I: Gender and Paradigm explores how Elizabeth I combined elements: male discourse, Elizabethan theatre, and the new Anglican church to maintain her power and rule for 45 years. The historical figure, Elizabeth, and her dramatic double, Rosalind, provide feminist studies with an insight into how British women of the 16th century used contemporary notions of masculinity and femininity to their advantage. Elizabethan studies and its contemporary plays offer examples of fluid gender identity used by females for safety, free speech, and self-determination. Elizabeth used the new Anglican church as divine validation for her rule and the fact that Elizabeth spoke directly to her people and her parliament and conducted international relations in at least six languages. Elizabeth I, and the theatre she so enjoyed, offer a dialectic for tracing the lineage of what is now referred to as feminism.
Elizabeth I, gender identity, attire, Shakespeare, feminism, discourse, women leadership
Claiborne Park, C. (1983). As we like it. In C. R. S. Lenz, G. Greene, and C. T. Neely (Eds.), The woman’s part (pp. 100-116). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Heisch, A. (1975). Queen Elizabeth I: Parliamentary rhetoric and the exorcise of power. Signs, 1(1), 31-55.
Heisch, A. (1980). Queen Elizabeth I and the persistence of patriarchy. Feminist Review, 3(2), 45-56.
Montrose, L. A. (1986). A midsummer night’s dream and the shaping fantasies of Elizabethan culture: Gender, power, form. In M. W. Ferguson, M. Quilligan, and N. J. Vickers (Eds.), Rewriting the renaissance (pp. 65-87). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rice, G. P. (1951). The public speaking of Queen Elizabeth I. New York: Columbia University Press.