Paper Status Tracking


Teemu Rantanen, Timo Toikko


Teemu Rantanen, Ph.D., Adjunct Professor, Vantaa Unit, Laurea University of Applied Sciences.
Timo Toikko, Ph.D., Adjunct Professor, School of Health Care and Social Work, Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.


In this study, young people’s attitudes towards entrepreneurship are examined in the Helsinki-Uusimaa region of Finland. The theoretical framework of the study links with attitude research, in particular Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. The second perspective is based on discussions of the welfare state and social values. In the study, it is asked what social psychological factors explain young people’s entrepreneurial intentions. Survey data (N = 873) were collected in electronic format from secondary and vocational schools. The questions were based on a multiple-choice Likert-scale. The analysis was undertaken using statistical methods, especially regression analysis. The results are mainly consistent with the theory of planned behavior: subjective norms and perceived control explain entrepreneurial intention. However, dependence between general entrepreneurial attitudes and entrepreneurial intention is not significant. The results demonstrate that there is no relation between social values and entrepreneurial intention in the Finnish context. Typically in social sciences, entrepreneurial discourse is linked to neo-liberal policy but, according to this study, entrepreneurship is a neutral issue among Finnish young people. 


attitudes, entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurship, Scandinavian welfare state, social values, theory of planned behavior

Cite this paper

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1-33.
Alestalo, M., & Kuhnle, S. (1987). The Scandinavian route: Economic, social and political developments in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. In R. Erikson, J. E. Hansen, S. Ringen, & H. Uusitalo (Eds.), The Scandinavian model: Welfare states and welfare research (pp. 3-38). New York and London: M.E. Sharpe.
Alestalo, M., Hort, S. E. O., & Kuhnle, S. (2009). The Nordic model: Conditions, origins, outcomes, lessons. Hertie School of Governance, Working Papers 41. 
Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (2012). Universalism in the British and Scandinavian social policy debates. In A. Anttonen, L. Häikiö, & K. Stefansson (Eds.), Welfare state, universalism and diversity (pp. 16-41). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 16(1), 7-25.
de Rosa, A. S. (1993). Social representations and attitudes: Problems of coherence between the theoretical definition and procedure of research. Papers on Social Representations—Textes sur les Représentations Sociales, 2(3), 1-192.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, T.X.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ervasti, H. (2012). Who hates the welfare state? Criticism of the welfare state in Europe. In H. Ervasti, J. G. Andersen, T. Fridberg, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), The future of the welfare state: Social policy attitudes and social capital in Europe (pp. 231-248). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ervasti, H., Fridberg, T., Hjerm, M., & Ringdal, K. (2008). Conclusions: Nordic uniqueness, reality or myth? In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 249-261). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Effect and counter-effect of entrepreneurship education and social context on student’s intentions. Estudiosde Economia Aplicada, 24(2), 509-523. 
Flash Eurobarometer 283. (2009). Entrepreneurship in the EU and beyond. Retrieved from
Gawel, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship and sustainability: Do they have anything in common? Working Papers 3/2011. Faculty of International Business and Economics, Poznan University of Economics. 
Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 628-364.
Helsingin kaupungin tilastokeskus. (2009). Nuorten koulutus Helsingissä. Tilastoja 38. Helsinki. 
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
Hofstede Centre. (2013). What about Finland? Retrieved from
Jensen, C. (2008). Worlds of welfare services and transfers. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 151-162.
Kivelä, P. (2002). Ammattikorkeakouluopiskelijoiden suhtautuminen yrittäjyyteen. Pirkanmaan ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisusarja A. Tutkimukset ja selvitykset. Nro 3. Tampere.
Kreiser, P., Marino, L., Weaver, K. M. (2001). Correlates of entrepreneurship: The impact of national culture on risk-taking and proactiveness in SMEs. University of Alabama, Department of Management and Marketing.
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411-432.
Kuivalainen, S., & Niemelä, M. (2010). From universalism to selectivism: The ideational turn of the anti-poverty policies in Finland. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(3), 263-275.
Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 257-272.
Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
Lindsay, N. J. (2005). Toward a cultural model of indigenous entrepreneurial attitude. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 5, 1-18.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2000). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 51-75.
Muuri, A. (2008). Sosiaalipalveluja kaikille ja kaiken ikää? Tutkimus suomalaisten mielipiteistä ja kokemuksista sosiaalipalveluista sekä niiden suhteesta legitimiteettiin. Tutkimuksia 178. Helsinki: Stakes.
Paakkunainen, K. (2007). Alkaisinko yrittäjäksi? Tutkimus nuorten yrittäjyyspoliittisista kirjoituksista ja asenteista. Yksityisyrittäjäin Säätiö, Kerhokeskus, Koulutyön tuki ry, Nuorisotutkimusverkosto. Nuorisotutkimusseura. 
Patomäki, H. (2007). Uusliberalismi Suomessa: Lyhyt historia ja tulevaisuuden vaihtoehdot. Helsinki: WSOY.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
Rantanen, T. (2013). Students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship in the Uusimaa region in Finland. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal. In press.
Rauch, D. (2007). Is there really a Scandinavian social service model? A comparison of childcare and elderlycare in six European countries. Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 249-269.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
Statistics Finland. (2013). Statistical databases. Retrieved from
Stenholm, P., Heinonen, J., Kovalainen, A., & Pukkinen, T. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Finnish 2010 report. Turku: University of Turku.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Coryright © 2015 David Publishing Company All rights reserved, 616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-4876, Valley Cottage, NY 10989
Tel: 1-323-984-7526, 323-410-1082; Fax: 1-323-984-7374, 323-908-0457 ,, Email: