 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Sensory Evaluation of Winter Cereal Silage
Carlos Eugênio Fortes Teixeira and Renato Serena Fontaneli
Full-Text PDF
XML 1141 Views
DOI:10.17265/1934-7375/2017.03.004
Silage is aimed at conservation of green fodder, with minimal losses and that this kind of food, does not occur formation of toxic compounds for animals. Practical aspects become important when control “in loco”, reflects management practiced in the property. There are different sensory evaluation techniques. The objective of this work was to study the applicability of the German system, now used in sensory evaluation of winter cereals (wheat silage and haylage oats). For quantitative analysis of silage (pH) that was used potentiometer. In determining the qualitative analysis was used German method adapted. Relating them to sensory characteristics such as smell, texture and color of the fodder saved by assigning a score to each sensory: a “key” predetermined quality identification. For multiple comparisons for film types tested in oat silages BRS Centauro, the results show that the qualitative sensory attributes evaluated by rating corresponded to the quantitative attributes (pH) evaluated, with no difference. For multiple comparisons in the silages, for all test loads in both wheat genotypes results showed no difference between the qualitative evaluation (sensory) and quantitative.
Ensiling, pre drying, quality.
[1] Freixal, R., and Alpendre, P. 2013. Conservação de Forragens: Ensilagem. Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia Departamento de Fitotecnia. Universidade de Évora, PT. 2013b. 51p. Disponível: https://dspace.uevora.pt/rdpc/bitstream/10174/9440/1/Conserva%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20de%20Forragens%20Ensilagem%20(2).pdf Acesso: dez 2015.
[2] Jobim, C. C., Nussio, L. G., Reis, R. A., and Schmidt, P. 2007. Avanços Metodológicos na Avaliação da Qualidade da Forragem Conservada. R. Bras. Zootec. v.36, Suplemento Especial, p.101-19.
[3] Junges, D. 2011. Avaliação Sensorial da Qualidade de Forragem Conservada. Centro de Pesquisa em Forragicultura – UFPR. Universidade Federal do Paraná. 2011.13p. Disponível em: http://www.ensilagem.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/G ROBFUTTERBEWERTUNG-II.pdf Acesso em: 22 dez 2015.
[4] Tomich, T. R., PEREIRA, L. G. R., GONÇALVES, L. C., TOMICH, R. G. P., and BORGES, I. 2003. Características Químicas para Avaliação do Processo Fermentativo de Silagens: uma Proposta para Qualificação da Fermentação. EmbrapaPantanal, Corumbá, MT. 20p.
[5] Genever, L. 2015. Making Grass Silage for Better Returns. AHDB Beef & Lamb is a Division of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB). Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, Warwickshire. UK. 20p.
[6] Adesogan, A. T., and NEWMAN, Y. C. 2014. Silage Harvesting, Storing, and Feeding. Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Document SS-AGR-177.EUA, 7p.
[7] Kaiser, A. G., and Piltz, J. W. 2004. Feed Testing: Assessing Silage Quality—Chapter 12. Eds: KAISER, A. G., Piltz, J. W., BURNS, H. M., Griffiths, N. W. “Feeding Silage to Dairy Cows.” In: Top Fodder Successful Silage. Second Edition. Australia. pp.312-33,468.
[8] Maccalman, H.,, Buckingham, S., and Powell, H. 2016. Why Analyse Silage? Fact Sheet. Behalf of the Welsh Government. November, 2012. 7p. Disponívelem: www.menterabusnes.co.uk/farming connect Acessoem: 05 jan 2016.