Contact us
 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Interactive Pedagogy and Massification “Empirical Study”
Author(s)
Jean Louis Monino, Soraya Sedkaoui
Full-Text PDF
XML 1246 Views
DOI:10.17265/1537-1506/2015.11.002
Affiliation(s)
Jean Louis Monino, Ph.D., professor and director of TRIS Laboratory, Faculty of Economics, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Soraya Sedkaoui, Ph.D., associate professor, Khemis Miliana University, Khemis Miliana, Algeria.
ABSTRACT
The training is now expanding in quantity and variety. Massification—which sank—forces universities to meet the challenge of public diversity and to justify pedagogical research. This article takes into consideration particular way of these new requirements heuristic and praxeological referred to teaching that must take into account the expectation of the learner. This work is in a descriptive and explanatory approach and aims to promote higher teaching practices through the new interactive technology tools to stimulate educational innovation within the university system. The aim of this work is the inclusion of massification to contribute to the development of a model for interactivity and effectiveness of learning. This model was developed from a theoretical approach since the state of the art and an empirical approach for several experiments. The study focused on a database C2i exams “IT and Internet certification of all learners of the Academy of Montpellier (n = 4,254) on the online formapro platform”. The results have shown that the success rate is highly correlated with the duration of prior self. The integration of these technologies in universities offers interactivity and learning environment for adjusting teaching practices and acquiring new skills.
KEYWORDS
interactive teaching, distance learning, internet and computer certificate, dematerialization of certificates, massification
Cite this paper
References
Docq, F., Lebrun, M., & Smidts, D. (2008). À la recherche des effets d’une plate-forme d’enseignement/apprentissage en ligne sur les pratiques pédagogiques d’une université: Premières approches. Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire, 5(1), 45-57.
Bruillard, E. (2010). Formation à distance: Dispositifs techniques. Structuration organisationnelle, spatiale et temporelle des environnements. Distances et Savoirs, 2, 207-221.
Jézégou, A. (2010). Se former à distance: Regard sur les stratégies d’autorégulation environnementale d’étudiants adultes. Savoir, 24, 79-99.
Monino, J. L., & Lesage, M. C. (2005). Réussissez le C2i. Paris: Ed Dunod.
Rege Colet, N., & Romainville, M. (2006). La pratique enseignante en mutation à l’Université. Bruxelles, Belgique: De Boeck.
Abrahamson, L., Roschelle, J., Crawford, V. M., & Shechtman, N. (2004). Advancing research on the transformative potential of interactive pedagogies and classroom networks (CATAALYST workshop report).
Aldrich, F., Rogers, Y., & Scaife, M. (1998). Getting to grips with interactivity: Helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 321-332.
David, B., Mercier, F., Chalon, R., Delotte, O., & Berthet, J. P. (2004). Amphi interactif: état de l'art et projet DRIM-AP (In actes des Premières Journées Francophones: Mobilité et Ubiquité 2004, Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, France).
Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (1992). Teaching in large classes in higher education, how to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Kogan.
Guthrie, R. W., & Carlin, A. (2004). Waking the dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. Proceedings from the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York. Retrieved from www.mhhe.com/cps/docs/CPSWP_WakindDead082003.pdf
Hake, R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Leclercq, D. (1999). Votes en amphithéâtre électronique pour animer de grands auditoires universitaires selon 6 paradigmes d’apprentissage/enseignement (In actes du 16ième colloque international de l’AIPU, 1999, Montréal : HEC, tome II).
Mercier, F., David, B., Chalon, R., & Berthet, J. P. (2004). Interactivity in large class using wireless devices. Proceedings from MLEARN 2004, Rome, Italy.
Smith, A., Stewart, R., Shields, P., Hayes-Klosteridis, J., Robinson, P., & Yuan, R. (2005). Introductory biology courses: A framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses. Cell Biology Education, 4(2), 143-156.
Dimet, B. (2005). History of the transformation of a distance learning course—The case of the creation of the ICT C2i PorTices module FIS 2005, symposium educational institutions face the digital (House of Human Sciences Paris-Nord, Carré des Sciences, Paris, France).
Popova, B. (2006). Usages imagined, anticipated, expected, ... possible uses, staffing, future ... Real uses of ENT-LR -University of Perpignan, ENTICE project (the investigation elements—2006). Proceedings from Symposium “Innovations, Uses, Networks”, Montpellier, France.