Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
A FEW CRITICAL REMARKS ON ART. 25/3/F OF THE ROME STATUTE
Author(s)
Igor Vuletić
Full-Text PDF
XML 1079 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2016.01.002
Affiliation(s)
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the author
discusses some possible future perspectives of Art. 25/3/f of theRomeStatute. This
article regulates two core institutes of traditional substantial criminal
law—an attempt and a voluntary abandonment of an attempt. This is considered to
be a huge step in codification of general part of international criminal law
since statutes of ad hoc tribunal did not have any such or similar provisions.
Other authors in criminal law literature have already argued a lot about the
interpretation of specific elements of this provision. Bearing that in mind, in
this research, the author discusses
the purpose or ratio legis of an attempt and abandonment of an attempt in the
Rome Statute. At the same time,
the focus is on the quest for changes and modifications of this provision de
lege ferenda.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
References