Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Naples, Parthenope, Italy

ABSTRACT

Unlike traditional teaching methods (face to face, in which a plurality of individual interfaces with the physical shape of a teacher), the modern technological systems have sparked numerous innovations to improve teaching methods. You hear about blended learning: integrating various methodologies (traditional and innovative) to provide a new pedagogical style to students. An important platform to facilitate the learning of university activities is Facebook: since 2004, the most popular social network in the world, with about one billion active users. In recent years, however, it has also been recognized as a useful e-learning platform. Thanks to Facebook, benefits of learning are associated to a better communication among students, a better access to resources and a better management of logistics courses. The social network involves students using technologies which are familiar to the new generations: There is an increasement of interactivity and collaboration, flexibility and networking. We must of course pay attention to the critical issues arising from the dangers of stalking, distractions, lack of privacy, but the advantages of a greater access to information, a better way to analyze researching capabilities and many other advantages make Facebook a new and important frontier for modern teaching.

KEYWORDS

teaching, blended learning, Facebook, social network, learning platforms

Cite this paper

Davide de Gennaro. (2015). From Face to Face to Face…book: New Methodologies for Using Facebook as a Teaching Tool. Psychology Research, 5(7), 428-434.

References

Barbaro, R., Di Lieto, G., Francischelli, E., Premutico, D., & Richini, P. (2012). Strumenti per la formazione esperenziale dei manager. ISFOL.

Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (Eds.). (1995). Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: Distance learning. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

Bonaiuti, G. (Ed.). (2006). E-Learning 2.0. Il futuro dell'apprendimento in rete, tra formale e informale. Edizioni Erickson, 6.

Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1337-1343.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California management review, 44, 25-46.

Downes, S. (2005). Feature: E-learning 2.0. E-learn magazine, 2005, 1.

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4).

Fewkes, A. M., & McCabe, M. (2012). Facebook: Learning tool or distraction?. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28, 92-98.

Fife, J. M. (2010). Using Facebook to teach rhetorical analysis. Pedagogy, 10, 555-562.

Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161.

Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2014). Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside.

John, P. D., & Sutherland, R. (2004). Teaching and learning with ICT: New technology, new pedagogy?. Education, Communication & Information, 4, 101-107.

Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187-198.

Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society7(3), 97-111.

Kirkpatrick, D. (2011). The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world. Simon and Schuster.

Lathi, B. P. (1998). Modern digital and analog communication systems 3e Osece. Oxford University Press.

Matuga, J. M. (2001). Electronic pedagogical practice: The art and science of teaching and learning on-line. Educational Technology & Society, 4, 77-84.

Munoz, C., & Towner, T. (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook in the college classroom. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, N.1, pp. 2623-2627.

Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243-249.

Penuel, W., Riel, M., Krause, A., & Frank, K. (2009). Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. The Teachers College Record, 111, 124-163.

Phillips, L. F., Baird, D., & Fogg, B. J. (2011). Facebook for educators. Retrieved June, 5, 2011.

Ranieri, M. (2005). E-learning: Modelli e strategie didattiche. Edizioni Erickson, 3.

Teclehaimanot, B., & Hickman, T. (2011). Student-teacher interaction on Facebook: What student find appropriate. TechTrends, 55, 19-30.

Walsh, C., Apperley, T., Abbott, C., Albright, J., Alverman, D., Beavis, C., & Wood, D. (2013). Towards hacker literacies: What Facebook’s privacy snafus can teach us about empowered technological practices. Digital Culture & Education, 5, 18-33.

Watkins, S. C. (2009). The young and the digital: what the migration to social-network sites, games, and anytime, anywhere media means for our future. Beacon Press.

Wildman, P., & Inayatullah, S. (1996). Ways of knowing, culture, communication and the pedagogies of the future. Futures, 28, 723-740.

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 001-302-3943358 Email: [email protected]